These HR/NHEJ kits are cell based, meaning they have the HR or NHEJ GFP reporters pre-installed. A single plasmid (I-Sce1) is transfected to activate repair. Please see this table for a summary and comparison/application of each kit.
Homologous GFP Repair Systems
HeLa Cell HR Kit (I-Sce1 Based)
HeLa Cell HR Kit (CRISPR-CAS Based)
Human Neuroblastoma Cell Line SH-SY5Y using (I-Sce1 transfection)
Mouse 3T3 Cell Line using I-Sce1 transfection
Mouse Neuronal Cell Line using I-Sce1 transfection
Custom construction Kit to make your own HR Cell Reporter
NHEJ GFP Reporter
Systems
Transfection-based HR and NHEJ kits use transient transfections to make a pool of cells containing the DNA reporters to allow the investigator to interrogate the 2 major DNA repair pathways. The advantages are:
Anticancer Screening for agents that target Human Topoisomerases: How we can advance your R&D.
TopoGEN offers powerful and tractable services to identify Topoisomerase-targeting drugs In Vitro.
Typically, Topoisomerase drugs by two distinct mechanisms:
These drugs block or restrict catalytic activity of the enzyme. Typically, CICs will act at steps 1 or 2 in the overall reaction sequence (see Fig. 1). By preventing the non-covalent (electrostatic or ionic bridge) complexes which are necessary to proceed to the cleavage complex (step 3), the reaction is effectively blocked. There are a number of Top2 CICs (ICRF-187) and many fewer Top1 CICs. Note that CICs can be highly non-specific since even elevated NaCl can even mimic a CIC. In other cases, strong DNA intercalators may interfere with the catalytic reaction sequence. Many in the field simply view a CIC as any agent that can interfere with the ability of a poison (like CPT and topo 1) to form cleavage complexes (ie, can ‘reverse or block’ the action of an IFP). This sort of dual drug testing approach can be complicated and we at TopoGEN have the view that it is better to directly test CICs in the absence of other drugs.
We offer this as a service.
These agents are technically poisons because they trap the re-ligation step in the sequence (or ‘poison’ the reaction sequence). Consequently, the enzyme becomes covalently trapped on the DNA target sequence and concurrently DNA cleavage is stabilized (single strand nicks with topo I and double strand DNA break for topo II). Mechanistically, it appears that IFPs intervene stereo-chemically in the cleavage complex, forming what is called a ‘ternary complex’ (topo+drug+DNA) wherein the IFP agent induces a mis-alignment of the cleavage intermediate making it unable to re-ligate. When testing IFPs (see Step 3, Fig. 1) it is vital that you perform a proteinase K digestion step, otherwise the cleavage products will shift in the agarose gel, making interpretation impossible.
These drugs block or restrict catalytic activity of the enzyme. Typically, CICs will act at steps 1 or 2 in the overall reaction sequence (see Fig. 1). By preventing the non-covalent (electrostatic or ionic bridge) complexes which are necessary to proceed to the cleavage complex (step 3), the reaction is effectively blocked. There are a number of Top2 CICs (ICRF-187) and many fewer Top1 CICs. Note that CICs can be highly non-specific since even elevated NaCl can even mimic a CIC. In other cases, strong DNA intercalators may interfere with the catalytic reaction sequence. Many in the field simply view a CIC as any agent that can interfere with the ability of a poison (like CPT and topo 1) to form cleavage complexes (ie, can ‘reverse or block’ the action of an IFP). This sort of dual drug testing approach can be complicated and we at TopoGEN have the view that it is better to directly test CICs in the absence of other drugs.
We offer this as a service.
These agents are technically poisons because they trap the re-ligation step in the sequence (or ‘poison’ the reaction sequence). Consequently, the enzyme becomes covalently trapped on the DNA target sequence and concurrently DNA cleavage is stabilized (single strand nicks with topo I and double strand DNA break for topo II). Mechanistically, it appears that IFPs intervene stereo-chemically in the cleavage complex, forming what is called a ‘ternary complex’ (topo+drug+DNA) wherein the IFP agent induces a mis-alignment of the cleavage intermediate making it unable to re-ligate. When testing IFPs (see Step 3, Fig. 1) it is vital that you perform a proteinase K digestion step, otherwise the cleavage products will shift in the agarose gel, making interpretation impossible.
Note that some drugs may display mixed modes of action, behaving as both CIC and IFP. In most cases, the inhibitory and cleavage maximal effects may occur at different concentrations of drug. Thus, they may titrate very differently.
At TopoGEN, we developed, trademarked and patented many of the technologies associated with drug effects on DNA. We are leading experts at drug testing and assessment of drug action from a mechanistic standpoint. When you engage our services, we will describe and lay out a logical/rational approach that is rich in content and strongly mechanistic. We offer independent consultants who can validate our findings. Our services offer expediency as well. We can significantly accelerate the pace of your research; produce publication quality data and you will own the intellectual property that comes with our studies. We routinely enter into confidentiality agreements on projects, so your results are protected. Our in-house testing program is flexible, fast, and efficient. You will receive publication quality data. The following are the “Top 10” reasons you should consider our screening services for your R&D needs:
We demonstrate internally that all testing platforms are perfectly functional. As a result, there is no guessing. Your data will be clear and unambiguous. We stand behind our findings and certify the data.
To document and validate the results. Again, we certify tractable results that will be internally controlled.
We tailor each contract to offer maximum flexibility and coordinate with you over the course of the project to ensure intellectual flow of ideas and results. We will advise you on the best course of action with all hits. You can select the level of detail for the project that best suits your needs. In some projects, there will be a need to re-examine, re-test or alter the course. How do we correct for work-load adjustments in the mid-stream? Our solution: we include on all projects, a small indirect cost that will allow us to perform additional key experiments without asking for additional funds. This is an advantage for clients and ensures that our high standards of data quality will be maintained. For example, if additional testing regimens are required, we carry out the service automatically. Importantly, there is no guessing on the budget and you will not pay additional fees.
We are a team of topo experts. All projects include email and direct SKYPE support over the course of the project. Our scientific staff will discuss and suggest future prospects or experiments.
For complete flexibility and to ensure cost-effective contracts, we offer two levels of reporting. At a basic level, included in all contracts, we provide well-documented data (PowerPoint, PDF or password protected cloud account). We draw conclusions, presented as bullets, on each slide and make a recommendation for further development and maturation of the project. For clients who wish to have a & ´manuscript´ style report, we offer fully referenced publication style reports. These reports are professionally prepared and are suitable for presentation to regulatory agencies. These publication style reports can be reviewed independently by third party opinion leaders in the field and the reviews appended to the final report.
The company has been actively engaged in contract drug testing since the 1990s and we have the experience to get results that will enable ‘go/no go’ decision making on drug development.
In most cases, the project will be completed over a period of several business days. We will clearly stipulate how long the project will take and we deliver on time.
We can test prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems with highly purified enzymes that are well-controlled reagents. We can provide additional documentation of purity and QC on all preparations. The following enzymes or tractable antibodies are currently in our inventory:
TopoGEN is a pioneer in testing agents that operate in the context of the cell. For eukaryotic systems, we can perform rigorous testing in tissue culture cells. We offer a variety of cell lines suitable for topo I, IIα and IIβ testing. For example, we can test your drug (either as CIC or IFP) in virtually any cell line of interest.
TopoGEN is unique in offering this service as part of our routine testing regimen. In all projects, we design our experiments to garner new information about your compound. For example, all gels are run in duplicate. One is a non-EB gel system, used to demonstrate unambiguous catalytic activity and the other gel is an EB containing gel to parse clearly the cleavage products. Since the reactions come from the same tube, we can be sure that the results are reproducible and accurate. Importantly, the non-EB gel system also reports whether the drug is a DNA intercalator, which may suggest genotoxicity in cells.
In this analysis, the client asked if we could test whether his compound (‘X’) was acting specifically as an IFP or poison. We designed the experiment to test this idea (see Fig. 1). We recommend that all unknowns be screened over a wide range of input concentrations to ensure that any weak positives will be detected. In this case we tested up to 30uM and at the highest input we detected IFP activity, although it was relatively weak. This experiment shows all the controls we include in the typical screen. These controls include markers that unambiguously identify the position of the various DNA as well as positive and negative controls. In this case we use the negative control (VP16, a Topo II poison), to clearly demonstrate that we are indeed detecting a Topo I event (ie, VP16 had no effect on the reaction with topo I as expected). Our positive control, CPT, generated the expected single strand DNA nicking event and yielding nicked circular DNAs (red circles). Because all controls worked as expected, we conclude the compound X is a week interfacial poison direct against human Topoisomerase I. We note that a similar approach can be used to detect CIC active drugs; however the experiment must be slightly modified to reveal basic catalytic inhibition. In this case, analysis